![]() The conclusions help me understand if the goal summarized in the abstract has been reached, and if the described work can be of interest for my own study. I first get a general idea by reading the abstract and conclusions. Jesse Shanahan, master's candidate in astronomy at Wesleyan University in Middletown, Connecticut Only when I have done that will I go back into the technical details to clarify any questions I might have. I try to identify the most prominent one or two figures, and I really make sure I understand what's going on in them. ![]() Then, I skim the introduction and flip through the article to look at the figures. The responses have been edited for clarity and brevity. ![]() Although it is clear that reading scientific papers becomes easier with experience, the stumbling blocks are real, and it is up to each scientist to identify and apply the techniques that work best for them. Many of you have come to us asking for more (and more serious) advice on how to make sense of the scientific literature, so we've asked a dozen scientists at different career stages and in a broad range of fields to tell us how they do it. Adam Ruben's tongue-in-cheek column about the common difficulties and frustrations of reading a scientific paper broadly resonated among Science Careers readers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |